Two important dates for the International Ban Asbestos Network (IBAN) :

Milan, Italy 1993: international conference on the carcinogenic nature of all forms of asbestos without any safe threshold limit in case of asbestos contamination

São Paulo, Brazil 1994: the International Seminar during which the policy of "controlled use" of asbestos was denounced and the ban asbestos strategies defined:

- Support to the victims struggles

- Fight against the lobby of the asbestos industry

- Action for a global asbestos ban and for the substitution of asbestos containing materials by non-hazardous others.

BAN ASBESTOS FRANCE arose in 1995, created by Henri Pezerat (former director of reearch, CNRS), the leader of the first anti-asbestos movement organized in France (1977, University of Jussieu), in cooperation with Annie Thébaud-Mony (Director of Research, INSERM, specialist in occupational health) and Patrick Herman (journalist, whistle-blower on asbestos). Ban Asbestos France has been actively part of the Andeva (National Association for Defending Victims of Asbestos) in 1996. The struggles of the numerous anti-asbestos groups all around the country finally allowed the prohibition of this material in France in 1997. Nevertheless, millions of tons of asbestos are still in place. 

 

2 0 1 7 

Dear all delegates who have participated of the Rotterdam Cop in Geneva,

Please find here our presse release about such frustrating results.

Thanks to all of you who fight so hard during these days.

In solidarity,

Annie

You can also read the communiqué issued by the World Alliance for Action against Asbestos, and the Earth Negotiations Bulletin.

You will find here a brief report from the Asian Ban Asbestos Delegation at the Rotterdam Convention COP 8 in Geneva, Switzerland, and an article on India’s contentious stand on Chrysotile asbestos. Also, the testimony of an Indonesian victim of asbestos.

 

Communiqué from Maître Jean-Paul Teissonnière - TTLA / Amisol Case

Deliberation of the Court of Cassation - Instruction of March 31st, 2017
Twenty years after the filling of the complaints:

- After two judgements of the Court of Cassation breaking the first two decisions of dismissed case, a third dismissed case has been pronounced to the advantage of the last CEO of Amisol, on March 31st, 2017,

- A third appeal in Cassation is announced by the plaintiffs,

- The blocking that justice puts up to the organisation of a contradictory public debate on the penal responsibility of the industrialists who massively exposed their employees to asbestos, adds a judiciary scandal to a sanitary scandal at the root of more than 100.000 passings in France.

 

Dear Eric & Ian,

In the name of Ban Asbestos, I am sharing congratulations of the International Ban Asbestos Network for such a determinant decision. It is giving hope to all of us!

Thanks for your will and work which succeeded to win against Eternit lawyers and experts.

In Solidarity,

Annie

 

Kenya struggles to scrap banned asbestos roofing - Claiming tens of thousands of lives each year, asbestos is recognised as a killer. Efforts continue to get rid of the material once loved by builders. You can watch a video report here.

USA - An article on a Russian website is predicting that measures under the Trump Presidency will include the downgrading of regulations preventing asbestos use. Referencing statements made both before and during the election, the journalist concludes that the powers of the Environmental Protection Agency will be greatly watered down and asbestos materials will enjoy a new popularity: "The most obvious way to reduce costs in the construction industry is to end the restrictions on the use of chrysotile asbestos." Read more in the news of http://www.ibasecretariat.org/ - "Russia: Omens for US Asbestos Revival?"

Ireland - Asbestos-related deaths are expected to hit a record high in the next few years as the legacy of decades of ignorance about the cancer- causing building material hits the country. You can read an edifying article from the Irish Examiner here.

A very instructive article in "The Havana Times" questions why the Cuban government has never taken action against the asbestos hazard. Our Spanish speaking friends can also read this second article, which title can be translated by "the Regime does not know?"

-------------------------------------------------

2 0 1 6

A very important decision of the supreme court could reopen the way of a criminal trial in France (Caper).

Una decisión muy importante de la suprema corte podría abrir el camino de un processo penal en Francia.

2 0 1 4
the associations' replies to the questionnaire - Social Affairs Commission - Senate, 2nd April 2014
-------------------------------------------------

Lab rats: The anatomy of deadly product defence campaigns - Hazards magazine (New report)

Some scientific hired guns try to hide their industry ties; others flaunt them. Either way cash-for-science can be very bad news for your health. Hazards editor Rory O’Neill follows the money… International health agencies and those scientists not in the pay of industry are clear that chrysotile asbestos is a potent cause of cancer. The asbestos industry though had a four step strategy to give its deadly product a clean bill of health.

1 Buy some evidence

2 Have a promotional tour

3 Get your man on the inside

4 Take the money and run

More here: http://www.hazards.org/deadlybusiness/labrats

Rory O'Neill. Editor, Hazards magazine www.hazards.org

Professor, Occupational and Environmental Health Research Group, University of Stirling, Scotland

Health, safety and environment adviser, International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC)


2013

The International Chrysotile Association, which works on behalf of the worldwide asbestos industry, will be holding an international conference in New Delhi December 3 & 4 to promote the use of chrysotile asbestos in India. REQUEST: Do you wish to add your name to the attached letter to the Indian government, asking the government to reject the deadly misinformation that the asbestos industry is disseminating and to protect the health of its people by banning asbestos ? If so, please send the following information to Kathleen Ruff kruff@bulkley.net, if possible by November 18:

1) Individual scientists and health professionals: please send name, titles & positions, and country.

2) Organisations: trade unions, ban asbestos, asbestos victims, health, environmental, public interest, etc groups, please send name of group and country.

Please forward this message to other scientists and organisations who might wish to sign the letter.

 

Short asbestos fibres - are they toxic? The true "false controversy" of the toxicity of asbestos fibres in France (Annie Thébaud-Mony, 2012)

 

UN Scientific Agency collaborating with scientists involved in sabotaging UN Rotterdam Convention (reading)

 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Asbestos: a scandal once again ! Denial of justice announced by the way of press articles - Press release, 15 May, 2013 :

According the journal " le Canard enchaîné ", the investigation chamber of the Appeal Court of Paris should take a shocking decision, on the next 17May, 2013, reversing the indictment of civil servants and other members of the Asbestos Permanent Committee, in the criminal asbestos trial in France.

Failure of secrecy is a serious disruption of the impartiality of judges in making a decision. But the most serious is the decision itself. The Court would have not identify any "link" between the deaths of tens of thousands of victims, for most workers, and the activity of the Asbestos Permanent Committee in which the Ministry of Labour was represented ex officio. However, this activity has been to prevent regulations on asbestos in France and Europe, from the early 1980s to the emergence of the social movement of asbestos victims and the ban in 1996.

Who will anyone believe that "senior officials have no regulatory power"? The state is not powerless when it has to protect the wealth of powerful people. Would it be without any capacity of action concerning the health and lives of workers, whose work has made the fortune of asbestos producers?

This decision, if confirmed, arouses indignation and revolt of asbestos victims and all those who fight at their side. It strengthens their determination to continue the struggle for justice. With their lawyers, Ban Asbestos France and the association Henri Pézerat will continue the action for the recognition by the criminal courts, of the reality of the asbestos disaster and its consequences as an industrial crime.


NO TO DUMPING TOXIC SHIPS ON DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

YES TO CLEAN SHIPS - YES TO POLLUTER PAYS - YES TO GREEN JOBS IN EUROPE

Petition to the European Parliament and to the European Council for an enhanced ship recycling regulation

15 April 2013 : We, the undersigned organisations active in environmental protection, sustainable development, health, labour and human rights, call on the European Parliament and the European Council to strengthen the proposed regulation on ship recycling (COM(2012)118) as presented by the European Commission on 23 March 2012. We believe that the proposed regulation will not prevent European owned ships - making up 40% of the world's fleet - from being scrapped on the beaches of Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan in foreseeable time. Nor do we believe that the proposed regulation will lead to substantial improvements to existing shipbreaking facilities in South Asia to lessen the severe environmental damage, the human rights abuses and loss of lives occurring at these facilities. We call on the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union to work together to finally put an end to the breaking of ships on tidal beaches, to take care for workers' safety, to provide adequate protection of the marine environment from ship-borne pollutants and to hold the shipping industry accountable. A dangerous precedent in EU environmental law. We believe that the proposal in its present form sets an extremely dangerous precedent insofar as it allows the EU to unilaterally withdraw from the UN Basel Convention. Under the Basel Ban Amendment - adopted in 1995 by the Parties to the Basel Convention and ratified by the EU in 1997 - exports of hazardous wastes such as end-of-life vessels to non-OECD countries, notably developing countries, are prohibited. The European Commission has proposed to remove end-of-life ships from its implementing legislation of the Basel Convention, the EU Waste Shipment Regulation (EC 1013/2006). Under international law, however, such a unilateral withdrawal by the EU is illegal, as the Basel Convention has not removed ships from its definition of hazardous waste. The European Parliament and the Council must consider the gravity of this misstep. We urge the European Parliament and the Council to improve the proposal so that it will remain in conformity with the binding legal provisions of the Basel Convention. No perpetuation of beaching of ships. In addition, the Commission proposal lacks clarity when it comes to banning beaching, namely the sending of end-of-life ships flying a European flag and/or owned by European companies to the beaches in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh for dismantling. Nowhere does the proposal address the role of flags-of-convenience as a root of the systematic disregard of the international regulations and the continuous illegal export of toxic wastes to non-OECD countries. The well-known loopholes, which allow shipowners to easily circumvent the Basel Convention and the Waste Shipment Regulation, must be closed. At the same time, the implementation of the already existing regimes must be enforced and ships must remain under the Waste Shipment Regulation. A green shipping industry in Europe. We demand that the new regulation includes an incentive to dismantle ships within the European Union and to support the European recycling industry as well as the environmentally sound and safe management of waste. Moreover, the proposal should draw a clear link between the support of pre- cleaning of the ships throughout their operational life and the development of green jobs in Europe. Not only would classification societies and other service providers benefit from mandatory inventories and auditing schemes for yards, but R&D within shipbuilding and dismantling, recycling and waste management, as well as refitting operations would also provide sorely needed jobs. A financial mechanism to establish the polluter pays principle. The current proposal does not display any ambition to hold the shipping industry accountable for externalizing the costs of the recycling of their vessels onto developing countries. Whereas EU environmental law clearly supports the polluter pays principle for other industries, it shies away from establishing a financial mechanism for the shipping industry in order to include those who benefit from the ships into the bill.

We demand an EU regulation on ship recycling that

" upholds the current prohibition on the export of ships containing hazardous materials to developing countries and to enforce the existing ban;

" explicitly bans the method of beaching ships for dismantling;

" covers not only EU-flagged ships (as only 8% of end-of-life vessels still use EU flags), but also incorporates a financial mechanism to include European-owned vessels and ships calling at EU ports;

" promotes green ship building and ship recycling within the EU (cradle-to-cradle principle);

" establishes the polluter pays principle and holds the shipping industry accountable.

 

Signed by: the NGO Shipbreaking Platform, Belgium

Patrizia Heidegger

Executive Director

 

The Platform's member organisations also signed this petition:

 

Basel Action Network (BAN), USA Jim Puckett

Executive Director

 

Ban Asbestos, France

Annie Thébaud-Mony

Spokesperson and Chair of the Henri Pézerat association

 

Bangladesh Environmental Lawyers Association (BELA), Bangladesh

Rizwana Hasan

Chief Executive

 

Bangladesh Institute of Labour Studies, Bangladesh

Nazrul Islam Khan

Executive Director & Secretary General

 

The Bellona Foundation, Norway

Svend Søyland

Senior international advisor

 

The Corporate Accountability Desk - The Other Media, India

Madhumitta Dutta

Spokesperson

 

Transport & Environment, Belgium

Bill Hemmings

Programme manager

 

Fédération Internationale des Droits de l'Homme (FIDH), France

Elin Wrzoncki

Head of globalization and human rights office

 

Greenpeace, Netherlands

Marietta Harjono

Toxics Campaigner

 

International Ban Asbestos Secretariat (IBAS), UK Laurie Kazan-Allen

Coordinator

 

Legal Initiative for Forest and Environment (LIFE), India

Ritwick Dutta

Environmental Lawyer

 

Stichting De Noordzee/The North Sea Foundation, Netherlands

Merijn Hougee

Project Manager

 

The Bangladesh Occupational Safety, Health and Environment Foundation (OSHE), Bangladesh

Repon Chowdhury

Executive Director

 

Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI), Pakistan

Kanwar Iqbal

Senior Research Associate

 

Toxics Link, India Satish Sinha Associate Director

 

Young Power in Social Action (YPSA), Bangladesh

Muhammad Ali Shahin

Platform Project Coordinator in Bangladesh

 

This petition was also signed by the following European NGOs:

 

Catalan Oceanographic Association, Spain

Fernando Condal Domingo

Marine biologist

 

Clydebank Asbestos Group, UK Hope Roberston

Secretary

 

Ecologistas en Acción, Spain

Lydia Chaparro Elias

Sea campaign coordinator

 

European Environmental Bureau, Belgium

Jeremy Wates

Secretary General

 

Greenpeace European Unit, Belgium

Jorgo Riss

Director

 

Legambiente, Italy

Antonio Pergolizzi

National coordinator - Ecomafie observatory

 

LPN - Liga para a Protecção da Natureza, Portugal

Sidónio Paes

Fisheries Policy Officer

LuminaConsult, Belgium Roberto Ferrigno Execu


URGENT APPEAL for AMISOL

February 8, 2013, the Appeal Court of Paris decided that the trial of Claude Chopin, former executive of the French asbestos textile factory "AMISOL", will not take place. No charge has been made against him. The door is now wide open for corporate abusers, free to commit industrial crimes knowing that they can do so with total impunity. In the past decades, a citizens' movement has made visible the asbestos scandal. Today, we ex-workers and factory workers Amisol fighting since 1974, we appeal the minister of justice in our country and to the judges of the French supreme court (Court of Cassation) to reconsider this decision.

Thank you for reading and sign this online petition: "Shame on Amisol French justice to the victims of the worst asbestos factory! '

http://www.petitionpublique.fr/?pi=AMISOL2

 

2 0 1 2
UK Mesothelioma Statistics in the Education Sector


NDP introduces asbestos right to know bill. David Giles, Global News : Thursday, November 01, 2012 2:05 PM

<http://www.globalsaskatoon.com/pages/media.aspx?id=6442745624&amp;mediaID=6442745624>

Private member's bill would require public access to list of public buildings containing asbestos.

Photo Credit: CHARLY TRIBALLEAU , AFP/GettyImages

REGINA - Saskatchewan's NPD have introduced a new private member's bill that would require a list be made available to everyone of all public buildings in the province with asbestos.

The asbestos right to know bill would cover government-owned buildings, health care facilities and schools. "Saskatchewan already has a list of public buildings which contain asbestos," said Cam Broten, NDP health critic and author of the bill.

"Creating a public registry with that list is common sense and it's the right thing to do." Broten said if passed, the new act would allow workers, patients and the public to make better informed decisions about their health and safety. The government already maintains a list of public building containing asbestos. The act would require that list to be made available online with details about asbestos containment in each building. "For a family choosing a personal care home, a tradeperson heading to a jobsite or a contractor planning a construction job, having an asbestos registry could be an important part of making an informed decision," said Broten.

http://www.globalsaskatoon.com/ndp+introduces+asbestos+right+to+know+bill/6442745624/story.html

Coordinator : c/o Environics Trust 177, Neb Sarai, IGNOU Road - New Delhi-110068 (www.oehni.)


The Ban Asbestos Phenomenon - The Winds of Change (... to read...)

Jean-Paul Teissonnière lawyer of the victims of industrial crimes indicted .... for defamation by the firm Eternit (press release, September, 6)

TURIN : Mr. Minister, Ladies and gentlemen, On behalf of the French activists Ban Asbestos France and Henri Pézerat Association, I wish you to read a public letter to Stephan Schmidheiny which has been sent last december. We express our solidarity with the struggle of the citizens of Casale Monferrato. With our respectful greetings. Annie Thébaud-Mony (06 76 41 83 46) .

 

Michelin should not build this factory in India! Supporting a citizen movement in India, we appeal to all those who reject the rule of the strongest to sign the petition : http://www.petitionpublique.fr/PeticaoVer.aspx?pi=P2012N18922

The social movements can not simply denounce - abstractly - the delocalisation of the economy. Not only does it ruin the job for us, but destroys the roots of the life of the poorest in the South. In India, a terrible conflict between a village of Untouchables - the lowest considered people in this country of castes - and Michelin, our big multinational corporation producing tires. Thervoy Kandigai is a village in Tamil Nadu state (southern India). About 1500 families, are traditionally living of pastures and forests near Thervoy. It is their territory. With this plant, Michelin is destroying it for ever. The forest is an essential area for the survival of this population without land. It is now confiscated and has already begun to be destroyed, with a dramatic risk of drying up the lakes supplying water to local villages. This French multinational corporation has indeed managed to convince the Indian federal authorities, and intends to build an ultramodern tires factory in place of the forest of the Untouchables. Space is already closed, buildings already under construction, a training centre already open. The villagers are fighting alone for two years, multiplying actions and hunger strikes. In return, they face repression, beatings, and police presence. Some of them are in jail since February 2011. They just elected a Panchayat - kind of mayor - openly opposed to the installation of Michelin. And they call for international support. France is at the forefront. As well as the inhabitants of Thervoy Kandigai, the signers of this petition request the cancellation of the project. On its website, Michelin India proclaims: "One of core Michelin's values is respect for people." The time has come to prove that such words are not only commercial advertising. Do not touch the Untouchables' forest at Thervoy Kandigai! The undersigned require:

o The cancellation of the construction project of a Michelin factory at Thervoy Kandigai

oThe land restitution to villagers

o Compensation to villagers for land destroyed

o The release of the eight persons who are jailed, amnesty for 61 persons awaiting for trial and the end of all violence against Thervoy people!

First to sign :

Annie Thébaud-Mony, sociologue, présidente de l'association Henri Pézerat, santé - travail - environnement ; Fabrice Nicolino, journaliste, association Henri Pézerat : Josette Roudaire, présidente du Comité Amiante Prévenir et Réparer, Auvergne, association Henri Pézerat ; François Roca, CGT Michelin ; Thierry Souzon, CGT Michelin ; Michel Chevalier, CGT Michelin ; Jean-Sébastien Gascuel, hebdomadaire Paysan d'Auvergne ; Jean-Pierre Serezat, Université populaire, Clermont Ferrand ; Eric Panthou, Historien,Syndicaliste FSU, Clermont-Ferrand ; Laurent Quinson, Bibliothécaire, Syndicaliste FSU, Lyon Corine Védrine, ethnologue, Saint-Etienne ....

2 0 1 1

Belgium : The court case being brought against Eternit by Françoise Jonckherre is to begin on Monday, October 24 at 8:30 am at the Palais de Justice in Brussels. It is the very first court case of an environnemental victim against Eternit in Belgium. Abeva, in cooperation with IOTA production, is organizing a conference on asbestos Sunday, October 23 at the Bozar Palace in Brussels. After the afternoon devoted to speaking and exchanges amongst the participants, the film "Dust" will be presented in preview at 19h30. It's a film relating the daily lives and the outcry of victims of asbestos in Casale (Italy). Iit is also a record in the trial image of 1600 plaintiffs against two leaders of Eternit Italy. Representatives and victims from Italy, France, and Britain will join us for the occasion. The Italian producers will also be present.

France/Japan : Sanitary impacts of the CMMP plant in Aulnay sous Bois (Seine Saint Denis) in French. Elements of comparison with the Kubota plant in Japan (2011).

press release of BANI (Rotterdam convention of 2011 june).

2 0 1 0
ANNUAL REPORT : NGO SHIPBREAKING PLATFORM 2009

Toronto Star - 6 June 2010 - Editorial by Kathleen Ruff

Note that the Government of Canada supports this asbestos lobbying organization with $250,000 per year… Here is their position about including chrysotile asbestos in the Rotterdam Convention: "The simple fact is that the inclusion of chrysotile to the PIC procedure would have been interpreted as a call for a ban and the substitution of chrysotile by replacement products. And, this consequence is against the expressed will of a large number of countries and their governments that favour the controlled and responsible-use policy." "There is no safe level of exposure, and if developed countries with all their laws and resources cannot use it safely, then how can Canada expect developing countries like India, where health and safety regulations are lax and unenforced, possibly use it safely ?" http://www.montrealgazette.com/business/Chrysotile%20Institute%20champions%20asbestos%20other%20name/3031134/story.html. Montreal Gazette - 15 May 2010 - Chrysotile Institute champions asbestos - by any other name

By MICHELLE LALONDE, The Gazette

A major player in the asbestos story is the Chrysotile Institute - which until 2004 was known as the Asbestos Institute - a non-profit organization set up in 1984 by the Quebec and federal governments to promote the safe use of chrysotile asbestos around the world. The institute is led by Clément Godbout, former president of the powerful Fédération des travailleurs et travailleuses du Québec (FTQ). In March, when NDP MP Pat Martin challenged the federal government's continued funding of the institute - $250,000 for 2010 - Godbout quickly rallied the troops, holding a news conference to defend the industry. At his side were heads of the chambers of commerce from Quebec's asbestos mining region, mayors of of Asbestos and Thetford Mines, the Manufacturers and Exporters of Quebec, Quebec Employers Council, Quebec Mining Association, Pro-Chrysotile Movement, and several union leaders. Clearly Godbout wanted to show that his institute is not the lone cheerleader for asbestos; he announced the formation of a new pro-asbestos coalition called the Regroupement de partenaires en faveur de la fibre chrysotile. Godbout and his colleagues scrupulously avoid the mention of the word "asbestos." The Chrysotile Institute has always maintained that anti-asbestos forces are woefully ignorant about chrysotile and are forever getting it confused with other, more dangerous forms of asbestos. He doesn't say that chrysotile is the only form of asbestos ever mined in Canada, virtually the only type on the global market today, and that the high levels of mesothelioma and other asbestos-related illnesses in Quebec today are due mostly to exposure to chrysotile asbestos decades ago. While it is true that conditions have vastly improved in Quebec mines and some workplaces where asbestos-containing products are made, those at risk today are mostly construction, renovation and maintenance workers whose jobs involve removing, cutting or otherwise disturbing asbestos-containing materials, and inhaling the dust. Godbout did not return a request for an interview for this article, but at his news conference in March, he said his institute works hard at raising awareness about the safe use of chrysotile asbestos in Quebec and around the world. He maintained that safe handling of chrysotile asbestos is possible in controlled environments. The institute publishes a "safe use manual" on its website, which explains the need for proper exhaust ventilation systems and/or water spray equipment to control the release of asbestos dust in the air whenever the material is cut, hammered, pierced or drilled. When journalists asked Godbout whether he expected workers in developing countries like India to have access to such specialized equipment, he said the only places where such procedures are not respected are small "mom and pop" shops that operate outside of regulatory frameworks. These places should be shut down by the Indian government, he said. But Dr. Tushar Joshi, director of the Centre for Occupational & Environmental Health at Maulana Azad Medical College in Delhi, said vast portions of India's workforce are unregulated, and the enforcement of safety protocols is almost non-existent in much of the country. "The whole Canadian approach of promoting controlled use of chrysotile asbestos, or saying that it is a safe product, is totally untenable in the light of accumulated scientific evidence," said Joshi, who was in Ottawa this week for the anti-asbestos demonstration on Parliament Hill. "There is no safe level of exposure, and if developed countries with all their laws and resources cannot use it safely, then how can Canada expect developing countries like India, where health and safety regulations are lax and unenforced, possibly use it safely?" he said. Indeed, a 2007 study by Montreal's public health agency found that of the very few companies in Quebec still using asbestos, not one was using it safely. There are 31 million people employed in construction in India, Joshi said, and the Indian government intends to spend $500 billion on construction of infrastructure over the next five years. If use of asbestos continues at its present rate, he fears India will be stuck with a massively expensive health crisis in a couple of decades.But Godbout says if Quebec gets out of the asbestos business, India will simply buy the mineral from countries like Russia that won't be as concerned about promoting safe use. A worldwide ban would have a "devastating effect on the jobs and economic development of certain regions of Quebec," Godbout said. He says those who advocate a ban on asbestos production are "pretty casual about taking away other people's jobs." He scoffed at suggestions that governments could redirect the millions they invest - both in his institute and in foreign trade missions promoting asbestos - toward economic diversification and retraining programs for miners in Thetford Mines and Asbestos. "Governments always talk about doing that," he said, "but it never happens." mlalonde@thegazette.canwest.com

 Ban asbestos completely else lift ban on chrysotile mining, says Indian Ministry of Mines. Civil Society demands ban on mining, manufacturing and use of asbestos.On 28/4/2010, Indian Ministry of Mines held a consultation meeting to explore the possibility of lifting the current technical ban on mining chrysotile asbestos, amidst Kerela Human Rights Commission's order banning use of asbestos in schools and a pending case in the National Human Rights Commission in the same matter. Occupational and environmental groups present at the meeting called for complete ban on asbestos of all kinds because asbestos fibers cause incurable diseases like cancer and sought Mines Ministry's support in getting a ban imposed on import chrysotile asbestos. The draft guidelines prepared by Indian Bureau of Mines (IBM), Union Ministry of Mines on possibility of safe mining of chrysotile asbestos drew severe criticism. Ban Asbestos Network of India (BANI), an alliance of public health, occupational health, human rights and environment researchers and activists argued, "it has been proven beyond reasonable doubt that no safe and controlled mining, production and use of asbestos and its products is possible." Ms Shanta Sheela Nair, Secretary, Indian Ministry of Mines supported BANI's position but argued, "Asbestos should be banned completely if not then why mining of asbestos within India should be not be allowed as well." Under manifest pressure from the "mine owners of Chrysotile Asbestos Mines" from Rajasthan, Andhra Pradesh and Jharkhand, the Ministry seems to be acting like a rubber stamp for the asbestos mining industry's proposal to lift the ban on mining of asbestos although Supreme Court has held that "The development of the carcinogenic risk due to asbestos or any other carcinogenic agent, does not require continuous exposure. The cancer risk does not cease when the exposure to the carcinogenic agent ceases, but rather the individual carries the increased risk for the remaining years of life. The exposure to asbestos and the resultant long tragic chain of adverse medical, legal and societal consequences, reminds the legal and social responsibility of the employer or producer not to endanger the workmen or the community or the society. He or it is not absolved of the inherent responsibility to the exposed workmen or the society at large. They have the responsibility-legal, moral and social to provide protective measures to the workmen and to the public or all those who are exposed to the harmful consequences of their products. Mere adoption of regulations for the enforcement has no real meaning and efficiency without professional, industrial and governmental resources and legal and moral determination to implement such regulations." Occupational and environmental groups demand that Ministry of Mines must come out with a status paper on asbestos victims in India's asbestos mines and the action it has taken to provide compensation and medical remedy to them.

Notably, Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) Standard mentioned in the proposed guidelines in this regard is mere paper work with no teeth to act. There is reference to how "No person shall be allowed to enter or remain in any work place which contains airborne asbestos dust at any time, exceeding the TLV (threshold limit value) of 1 fibre per cc, perceptible through standard monitoring procedures" and "No person shall enter or remain in any place which contains airborne asbestos dust at any time exceeding the limit of 1 fibre per cc in the working atmosphere, as observed in standard monitoring, unless such person is wearing approved type respiratory equipment to prevent the inhalation of such dust." The fact is that WHO's conclusions and recommendations for protection of human health in Environmental Health Criteria 203 for Chrysotile Asbestos concludes, "No threshold has been identified for carcinogenic risks". Also it says, "The impact of chrysotile/serpentine presence and degradation on the environment and lower life forms is difficult to gauge. Observed perturbations are many but their long-term impact is virtually unknown." In such grave circumstances, it is blind lust for profit at cost alone that makes people propose standards when there is no level at which it is deemed safe.

BANI drew the attention of the Ministry towards the resolution of International Labour Organization (ILO) adopted by the 95th Session of the International Labour Conference, in June 2006, which stated that "all forms of asbestos, including chrysotile, are classified as known human carcinogens by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, a classification restated by the International Programme on Chemical Safety (a joint Programme of the International Labour Organization, the World Health Organization and the United Nations Environment Programme)". The resolution noted that "an estimated 100,000 workers die every year from diseases caused by exposure to asbestos and resolved that "the elimination of the future use of asbestos and the identification and proper management of asbestos currently in place are the most effective means to protect workers from asbestos exposure and to prevent future asbestos-related diseases and deaths". This shows that the proposed guidelines by the chrysotile mining ministry is blind to the global trend, domestic occupational health conditions and the preventable deaths that occurs due to asbestos mining and its subsequent uses.

Notwithstanding the fact that the current legal position with regard to asbestos is that there is ban on the import/export of waste asbestos (dust & fibers) under the Hazardous Waste (Management, Handling and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2008, the proposed guidelines misleadingly says, "Asbestos containing residue is covered under the Hazardous Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 1989. Accordingly, hazardous waste may be transported, treated and disposed of as per Hazardous Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 1989". The meeting was attended by representatives of Ministry of Labour and Environment besides representatives from Central Pollution Control Board, National Institute of Occupational Health, Mining and Geology Department, Rajasthan, Mining and Geology Department, Andhra Pradesh, Mining and Geology Department, Jharkhand, Directorate General of Mines Safety, National Institute of Miners' Health, Campaign for Prevention of Silicosis & PRASAR.

For Details: Gopal Krishna, convener, Ban Asbestos Network of India (BANI)

Mb: 9818089660, E-mail:krishna2777@gmail.com, Web: www.toxicswatch.com

Blog: banasbestosindia.blogspot.com

TURIN : With the support of the region Piedmont and the participation of the president of Region Madam Mercedes Bresso, the international Ban Asbestos network gathered in Turin, the spokesman of Eternit' victims come from Brazil, from Peru, from India, from Japan, from China, but also from Belgium, from Switzerland, from Italy, from France, from Holland, from England. More than hundred persons participated in the meeting. The interventions illustrated, sometimes in a poignant way, the global strategy developed by StephanSchmidheiny and Louis Cartier de Marchienne, as president - Chief Executive Officer of each of toth firms, for a global expansion of the market of the asbestos, at the price of million victims. The present lawyers explained how every stage of the trial establishes a victory of the plaintiffs. The participants issued the appeal of Turin. Please see: The Day of Reckoning: Eternit on Trial ! Speech of Bruno Pesces Speech of Bruno Pesces of the Association of families victims of the asbestos. PHOTOS.

TURIN : In front of deathly silence of the firm Eternit... Break the impunity ! Such is the sense of the meeting organized by the international network Banns Asbestos in Turin on March 15th and 16th, 2010. Testimonies coming from three continents... Fights so that justice is returned to the victims of this announced global disaster...The solidarity in the heart of the " globalization from below "...For more information, read the program and come to join us and the public notice. For the international network Ban Asbestos : Fulvio Aurora, Annie Thébaud-Mony and all those who participate in the event

 

Times of India, Jaipur Edition, Saturday January 2, 2010

Airborne fibre in asbestos units higher than permissible limit

Anindo Dey | TNN

Jaipur: It is not just asbestos mines in the state that is causing asbestosis amongst workers but an indepth study of the small processing units in Rajasthan has brought to fore that the airborne concentration of fibre in such units are much higher than the prescribed national permissible exposure limit.

The study, 'Human Risk Assessment Studies in Asbestos Industries in India,' was done under the leadership of Dr Qamar Rahman, dean, Research and Development Integral University, Lucknow and sponsored by the Central Pollution Control Board.

Parts of the study that was made public by Dr Qamar Rahman at a recent meet in Delhi on the spread of asbestosis in the country say that the air-borne fibre concentration in small-scale asbestos processing units in the state stands at 18-22 f/cc against the national limit of 0.5 f/ml.

According to Dr Rahman, Rajasthan that produces 95% of India's asbestos still has a lot of illegal asbestos mines resulting in the birth of nearly half the country's small scale asbestos processing units.

"Most of these plants use indigenous tremolite asbestos and process it using obsolete techniques. The housekeeping in these units is very poor and children and pets often play on heaps of asbestos," says Dr Rahman.

Heavy exposure to airborne asbestos fibres over a prolonged period results in asbestosis or a disease of the lungs leading to lung cancer. The first symptoms of asbestosis is breathlessness which however manifests itself only after 20 years of first exposure.

But in case of workers in small-scale units of the state, 59% of those who have asbestosis were exposed to the fibre only for five years. Out of the rest 22% had 5-10 years of exposure, 15% had 11-20 years and 4% had 20-30 years of exposure. In her study, Dr Rahman explains that the reasons for the workers developing asbestosis earlier than normal as exposure to the highly fibrogenic termolite asbestos or due to double exposure to cooking fuel smoke domestically and to asbestos occupationally.

"This is an eye opener for all of us. So far we were under the impression that the manifestation of the disease happens only after 20 years of exposure. This also reveals the high concentration of asbestos fibre in these small scale units," says Madhumita Dutta of the Occupational and Environmental Health Network of India (OEHNI).

According to Dr Rahman the lung function tests of these workers revealed high levels of obstruction. "Most of these units do not follow the safety norms laid by the government thus exposing workers to fatal-asbestos related malignancies."

2 0 0 9
Press Release in Turin, November 25 : Eternit

The association Ban Asbestos France is very sad to inform you of the death Patrick Herman partner, Nicole Seurat. We thank every one who know Patrick to think to him and to send some message in solidarity : patrick.herman@free.fr

Support the bill to ban Canada's asbestos exports. Send your letter to all party leaders.

Presentation of the Henri Pezerat Memorial Award (Hong-Kong - April 27, 2009) - article IJOEH in memoriam Henri Pezerat by Laurie Kazan-Allen

The Taipei Declaration for a Global Asbestos Ban (May 15, 2009)

8 May - Dear environmental, labor, human rights, health, activist : Please take a few minutes to sign onto this global statement of concern (attached) regarding the upcoming International Maritime Organization Diplomatic Conference on Ship Recycling. We will be taking this Statement to the upcoming Conference in Hong Kong. Those wishing to sign please send ... your name, title, organization, and country to yuka@ban.org. Tank you so much.  Ingvild Jenssen (www.shipbreakingplatform.org) NGO Platform on Shipbreaking, Jim Puckett, Basel Action Network.

 Landmark Ban Asbestos Conference in China (Hong Kong, 26-28 April 2009). Annie Thébaud-Mony, present at the conference, represented Ban Asbestos France.

 

click on the images for information on cases in France

2 0 0 8

 The ITUC has condemned the decision to exclude chrysotile asbestos and the pesticide endosulfan from the list of dangerous products under the Rotterdam Convention, the international agreement which regulates exports of hazardous chemicals. 

A wonderful article about the asbestos demonstration this weekend in Paris and Canada's role in the French asbestos scandal! 2008 October

 Media Release, August 13.2008, Canada obstructing U.N. Convention over asbestos

European Report; April 30, 2008 - EU/ROTTERDAM CONVENTION : CONTROLS TO COVER ADDITIONAL HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES

Another three hazardous substances - chrysotile asbestos, endosulfan and tributyl tin compounds - could by the end of the year be placed under the Prior Informed Consent (PIC) procedure applicable to international trade in certain hazardous chemicals and pesticides. In a draft Council decision (COM(2008)176), the European Commission proposes to support the proposal amending to that effect Annex III to the Rotterdam Convention(1), which will be submitted to the Fourth Conference of Parties (Rome, 27-31 October 2008). The Commission considers it "necessary and advisable" to support this proposal to ensure that countries of import benefit from the protection afforded by the convention. It notes that the three substances are already prohibited or strictly regulated in the EU and subject to export requirements that are even stricter than those set by the convention. The Rotterdam Convention encourages the sharing of responsibilities and cooperation between contracting parties in the area of international trade in certain hazardous chemical substances. It encourages ecologically rational use of these substances by facilitating the exchange of information on their characteristics, establishing a national decision-making process applicable to import and export, and notifying these decisions to the contracting parties. Annex III contains the list of chemical substances covered by the PIC procedure. The document is available at www.europolitics.info > Search > 224620

(1) The convention was adopted in Rotterdam, on 10 September 1998, and entered into force on 24 February 2004. It was ratified by the EU on 25 September 2006. Council Decision 2006/730/EC - OJ L 299 of 28 October 2006.


BAN ASBESTOS CANADA - MEDIA RELEASE - March 16, 2008

Ban Asbestos Canada (BAC) applauds the NDP's support for the World Health organization's call for action to eliminate asbestos disease and asbestos use around the world. "This is the first Canadian parliamentary party to take a stand against asbestos," said Larry Stoffman, executive member of BAC and Chair of the National Committee on Occupational and Environmental Exposures. "Canada is one of the few industrialized countries who have continued to mine and export asbestos while rejecting the call of all independent, recognized scientific organizations around the world to ban all forms of asbestos." BAC is a national coalition of labour, health, and environmental groups that are dedicated to banning asbestos in Canada, ensuring compensation for all affected Canadian workers, and to promoting international conventions aimed at controlling the international trade in hazardous substances, such as asbestos. "We look forward to working with the NDP to ensure both real economic support for laid off asbestos workers and a comprehensive campaign for just compensation for thousands of Canadian workers afflicted with asbestos caused disease," said Wayne Peppard, Executive Director of the BC & Yukon Construction Building Trades Council. "Government support for this dying industry that has exploited Quebec workers must stop now." "From a public health point of view, the NDP's support for the WHO's position is, in our view, the only possible responsible position," stated Micheline Marier of the Association of Asbestos Victims of Quebec. "The population in the Asbestos region has paid a heavy price since the beginning of mining this mineral and we call on governments to assist in the revitalization of the region, as well as the environmental clean-up of the former asbestos mines" said Marier. Increasing numbers of Canadians are dying from asbestos, the world's biggest occupational health killer. In 2007 in B.C., for example, over half of occupational deaths were from asbestos-related disease."This carnage from asbestos related fatalities is disastrous for those workers and their families," Peppard said. "It's long past time that the Canadian government stop the production and use of asbestos". Canada exports over 95% of its asbestos to developing countries and has continually undermined any attempt to have asbestos banned or labeled as a dangerous product. "We are calling on all the political parties to end their unholy alliance with the asbestos industry," said Kathleen Ruff, founder of RightOnCanada, a citizens' human rights group. "All the political parties say their top commitment is to protect people's health. Let's see them put that commitment into action and eliminate asbestos use now."  Contacts: Larry Stoffman - 604-250-3713; Wayne Peppard - 778 388-0014; Kathleen Ruff - 250-847-1848; Micheline Marier - 514-847-8381.  


Announcement (Wednesday, March 19, 2008; Posted: 05:02 PM).THETFORD MINES, QUEBEC, Mar 19, 2008 (MARKET WIRE via COMTEX). Mazarin Inc. (TSX VENTURE: MAZ.H) announces that its wholly-owned subsidiary, 9075-6453 Quebec Inc. was forced to assign all of its assets in the hands of Raymond Chabot Inc., trustee. The subsidiary is the owner of the Bell mine in Thetford Mines. Last August, it had authorized, under certain conditions, 9184-6808 Quebec Inc. (LAB Chrysotile) to operate the mine. At the end of this month, LAB Chrysotile will cease operations at the Bell mine. After considering several avenues, the subsidiary has concluded that its limited financial resources did not allow it to operate the mine or to meet its financial obligations on an ongoing basis. This press release contains forward-looking statements which reflect the Company's current expectations regarding future events. The forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those projected herein. The TSX Venture Exchange does not accept responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release. SOURCE: Mazarin Inc. According to a press article, it appears that law through access to information in Canada, it was discovered in 2006 that there is some kind of understanding between Canada and other exporting countries asbestos (like Russia and Kyrgyzstan), to maintain artificially high prices of asbestos in order to prevent the bankruptcy of the Canadian asbestos in return for funding of the institute of chrysotile by Canada which becomes the propagandist of asbestos in the world. But last year, the Canadian dollar has risen considerably, thereby increasing the cost of Canadian goods to other countries that can no longer sustain competition. And that is perhaps the reason, in spite of the agreement, the bankruptcy of the mine Bell Thetfort Mines.


Media release dated March 11, 2008, OMG in the world, to save the Rotterdam Convention


Endangering others: the appeal court of Douai just order the company Alstom, March 6, 2008, be punished by a fine of 75,000 euros (confirming the judgement of first instance in Lille in 2006) for knowingly allowed the 300 employees of the Lys-Les-Lannoy into contact with asbestos in full knowledge of the risks from 1998 to 2001, and a former director of the factory in 3000 euros fine and 3 months suspended prison term (instead of 9 months sentence in the first instance, the Court having considered that the director was merely relaying the will of the leadership, minimizing liability). On this last point, the employees are very unhappy because more than 100 of them are sick from asbestos and a dozen died. On March 14, Alstom Power Boilers indicates that it does not provide for judicial review.


International Meeting in Austria on 6 and 7 February 2008 for a ban on asbestos in the world.


Report Henri Pezerat against Bernstein's work on chrysotile asbestos


Aulnay-Sous-Bois' CMMP disused factory

A new demolition permit and a new plan for asbestos removal must be presented for the totallity of the site, after the annulation, cancellation by law of those given only for block B (old asbestos workshop).

The prefect, during a meeting including the associations, promised that a first flexible project, adressed to the Health, Labour and Ecology ministries for verification, would then be submitted, for discussion, to all protagonists, including the associations (letter sent be the associations on the 31/10/2007 to the ministers).

On Saturday 25/11/2007, France3 mentionned the file on this contaminated site (see videos on page struggle /history and it was mentionned that the prefecture would at last give to CMMP the order to take numerous samples, so far this has not been done, when the regularitions insist on this before any demolition work is started (the associations have been asking for this for years). On the 10/12/07 they send to the ministries another letter which specific regards as to technical issues. On the 25/02/2008, the associations contacted the prefect again, because there was absolutly no follow up to the France3 november broadcast. Complete radio silence !

On the 29/03/2008 they wrote to the new Aulnay Sous Bois mayor to inform him of the polluted site present situation and to ask for his support in installing an external protection bubble. On the 07/04/2008 they send a reminder to the ministries (Health, Labour, Ecology), the 11/04 they issued a press release and the 06/04 they organised a public meeting. Around 100 people came to the Gainville suite in Aulnay Sous Bois. The new mayor and his environmental aide were present. Monsieur Ségura, was in favour of "demolition in the best conditions", then Monsieur Amédro asserted that "the town is for demolition under external protection airtight bubble". They promised their support to the associations in their approach to the authorithies and to act for the installation of urgent measures for the safety of the locals. At the end of the meeting, two motions were voted by the participants to be sent to the prefect.

The new mayor wrote to the Prefect about the emergency procedure for the safety of the locals and issued a press release. The associations will meet him soon. The Mayor is to meet on site with the associations on the 3rd June. In this way, they will be able to witness the immediate security measures taken by the owner, before work on the site can be started.

In the Aulnay municipality May 2008 number, a lenghthy article tells of the old CMMP factory site, in which it is confirmed that the new municipality, which gives itself eighteen months to sort everything out, is favourable to an outside confining. We congratulate ourselves, this will help in resolving this conflict which has been going on for ten years.

The work inspection of Aulnay has recently send a letter to CMMP and to the present owner on the methodology to respect regarding asbestos that is to say an our and waterproof external confinment which is after all the application of the disposition of asbestos.

As well, CRAMIF send them the same king of letter : in this matter, CRAMIF, with it's ingeneers and technicians, outs as technical adviser for the work inspection, when it is requested.

This control has always been demanded by the prefect on the two June.

The associations met the prefecture represantative at the towerhall on the nine November. Were present the mayor and his environment deputy. They repeated their propositions to come out of the inertia of the present situation. Following this, on the September 17, to the prefect, regarding the 7th prefectorial decree destined for the CMMP (it must be remembered that after th 4th decree of 2004, the CMMP went to law about the distribution of cost regarding depolution and demolition, beetween the actual owner and itself and to avoid erecting a bubble acound the buildings and polluted grounds and that the judge's decision was only given in July 2007 !).

During the week-end of the 27 th and 28 th of September 2008, the associations held a stand at the old Aulnay association forum. An exposition on the history of the CMMP factory pollution (development of the situation) and a 5 mn continuons film informed the public. A petition collected 500 signatures during that week-end with the view of enforcing the respect of the rules (air tight bubble) during the work of decontamination-demolition of the old factory.

Watch this space ....


The Albert tower in Paris :

In regard to the disposal of asbestos, the foreman insisted on the solutions recommended by CRAMIF with the endorsment by the work Inspection Department. It brought about further costs, but that's the price of safety. The cheap working yards for asbestos removal, are most of the time in breach of regulations (at the last national control, 75 % the sites were in infraction !). In the case of the Albert tower with its twenty three floors and three elevators in the well an adequate solution had to be found : one elevator cut off, the working machinary protected by airtight casing which will completly cut it off from the well, stopage of the working of the elevators during the dust removal from the well at night, the use of the roof of the elevators as scaffolding. The three elevators go down simultanously as the dust removal progresses, from the top to the bottom while a strong air current blows in the same direction to stop the fibres going back up and thus contaminate the clean areas. In this way, the disposing of the asbestos can be done following regulations. The work is done in several stages.

Today, the fourth phase of the work has been put back several weeks, following the breaching of a wall leading to a suspect flocking in the car park area. Alerted by the co-owners, Ban Asbestos send a mail on the 25/02/2008 to the work inspector supervising this site. Work should normally start again on Monday 21/04. The preparation of the site starting again towards the suspect flocking, Ban Asbestos went on site to take photos and to intervene once again with the work inspector.

No account was taken of our warnings and the disposal of asbestos started again the week of the 25/04 during 5 nights with access to the car park doubtful flocking. Now, this time, will precautions be taken for the dismantling of this site ? Will the suspect flocking be at last taken away following regulations for flaky asbestos ?

Watch this site ....


The "Comédie Française" in Paris :

For the second time in a few months, the leading institution of a certain "french culture" found itself in front of the "social security cases court ", to answer to the accusation of inexcusable negligence.

A first action had been taken by the widow of F. Delayre, electrician at the "Comédie Française". He died of a bronco pulmonary cancer. The judgement given by the Auxerre (TASS) had heavily sanctionned the famous house, who since has appealed.

On the 02/02/2008, in Nanterre, madame D. Brought a charge against this establishment. Her husband, a machinist/stage hand, had worked for them all his life. He died on the 27/04/2003 of a fibrosis diagnosed in 1980.

Solicitor for the D. Family, maître Sylvie Topoaloff, presented all the different elements of a daming case against mister D's employer, from the medical certificate asking the recognition of a professional illness, to the repeated interventions by CHSCT, the CRAMIF, etc ...

"An extradocumented file on the realisation of the danger" concluded maître Topaloff.

In answer, the lawyer for the Comédie Française tried to discredit the testimonies of the file, while trivalising the origins of the asbestos pollution of the site and trying to present it as a succession of airtight compartments, free of all lethal fibres. She then produced her joker : the certificate of an "independant" (sic) doctor, who reinterpreted without the permission of the family and in violation of professional ethic, the medical file of Mr D. Among this interpretation, one must note "hypersensibility to birds" because Mr D. Kept a canary. Nobody knew, until now, that feathers could cause pulmonary fibrosis.

Judgement was given. It did not condemn the Comédie Française for gross negligence and dismissed all the widow's demands. It provoked utter consternation and great anger within the victim's family and quite rightly because the case against the Comedie was overwhelming. Monsieur D'family has decided to appeal. The complete file will be transfered to the Versailles Appeal Court.

The second proceeding against the Comedie Française (Monsieur Delayre) must take place on June 12 to Appeal Court.

Watch this site ......